Loading...

English / 22.04.2020 / 141

Rule of the Weakest

Nikolay Mokhov, author from the Dark Side of Business

A dense leader confident in their authority likes to give out orders.

“Because I said so!” the strongman loudly exclaims.

The leader of the 1917 Russian Revolution, comrade Trotsky, called all the shots himself. He did it to show that he was the master of life and death. Trotsky was outsmarted by comrade Stalin.

Stalin killed more people than Trotsky. Stalin ruled the USSR longer than Trotsky. And Stalin never took responsibility. How could a “mere secretary” (this is what the dictator called himself; and who else would dare say that?) make all the decisions himself? What are you saying! There were people for that. They were called “responsible comrades”. It was them who took personal responsibility upon themselves. And on their way out, they would get a bullet to the back of the head…

Every long-lived ruler knew they only had two tools for control: scheming and manipulation.

Why did Stalin make himself out to be weak, and not strong? Why did Stalin have no problem announcing to the Party Congress that he was too old to be running the country?

A wise leader understands they are weaker than those they lead. Not even the most terrible dictators are more powerful than the people they subjugate. A tenth of the population gets together, and there goes your dictator. One person is nothing before a crowd. If you are weaker than your subordinates, how do you control them?

Take women, for example. Women are weaker than men. A foolish girl would try to prove otherwise. A wise one would emphasize her fragility.

“To all the sovereigns of Europe, I am a skillful flirt” wrote Catherine the Great. The empress was in charge of great generals: Kutuzov and Suvorov. Each of them had enough men and resources to drive the German monarch from the throne. But they didn’t dare. She reigned for 34 years. Her cocky son, Paul, didn’t last five years.

Paul did not want to be a skillful flirt. Paul wanted to emphasize his power. Paul was used to giving orders. Which is why the Georgian prince struck him in the temple…

And that’s not unique to Russian history. This happened in all times and on all continents. The weak Cleopatra stayed in power for 21 years. Her powerful lover, Caesar, was overthrown after 16. English Queen Elizabeth I ruled for 45 years. Her successor lasted half as much. Elizabeth II has remained on the throne for 67 years. She outlived all her “responsible comrades”: Churchill and Margaret Thatcher, Yeltsin and Gorbachev, Nixon and Kennedy.

Elizabeth II is the quintessence of what authority is: enormous power in absolute weakness. The Queen holds no particularly important levers in hand. She’s just a woman… But somehow her word weighs more than those of every other leader on the planet combined. And somehow, Ian Fleming called his James Bond novel On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, not On Great Britain’s Secret Service.

And one more thing. Several years ago, there was a scandal. The Queen was revealed to own four apartments in Moscow.

“The Queen owns some real estate, which she rents out.” commented the British without batting an eye, promptly getting rid of the “extra” square footage. The Queen was then found to own some secret offshore accounts… And here’s the killer question: who does the legendary MI6 really serve..? Of course, we stick to the official story. The Queen loves buying apartments in countries she never visits and opening secret accounts she never uses. And the MI6, according to Wikipedia, serves the Foreign Secretary… But none of that is important. Don’t miss the main secret.

And the main secret to remaining in authority is this: understand what your power is and… demonstrate your weakness. Weakness allows for manipulation. Every long-lived ruler knew they only had two tools for control: scheming and manipulation.

This is why there is always competition for who is the most miserable. Whose country suffers the most? Whose people have it worse right now? Jewish people like to poke fun at their national trait: their ability to appear poorer than they are and to complain. It’s a useful talent for a ruler. Just like the God-given right to say:

“I’m just a dumb broad! What can you expect of me?”

And the man thinks:

“I am the master of the house! I am responsible for my family…”

In this moment, the man makes himself subordinate. And how can you not seize the opportunity to control someone so submissive..? This is how it happened in all times… And our times are no exception.



Book "Father’s Time"

“Father’s time” – is that book about father, or son? Maybe it’s about time.

Reading again literature from school program, tried to imagine – what if “Fathers and sons” Turgenev would write today, how it would look like? After almost 150 years, in time of internet and everlasting rush, “wild business” and “drugs”, skinheads and gastarbeiters, cold relationships between relatives and warm love of strangers. And most important, what could connect today two generations, one born in non-existing empire of state standards, and another, formed in fight of antagonisms?

Read more...

The Simple Person's Nightmare

I am a complex person. And there exist simple people. Simple people have it really bad right now. A simple person is faced with a crisis and doesn't know what to do with themselves. What is a crisis for them? They used to work as a fitness trainer, and now they can't. They have to rebuild their whole life, but how? Their slightly more advanced friends and relatives tell them:

“Well, you can do workouts through Skype!”

Read more...

Queen of the spoken word...

Tanya’s mother beat her weekly. She tried to restrain herself, and not hit her child every day, but it didn't always work out. It was all thanks to her daughter being so different with her fantastical stupidity and incredible self-confidence.

“You realize that you can't even work as a janitor? Today, even they have a higher education... And you can't even string three words together," shouted the fat math teacher.

Read more...

Why Do You Need a Relationship?

As any person in their right mind, many years ago I would have found the question ridiculous. What do you mean, “Why?” Isn’t it obvious? It's love, it's family, that’s just how it goes, it’s human nature, what am I, some kind of loner… bottom line: I had a lot of answers to such a silly question.

Read more...

By remain on the site, you agree to use by us of cookies. It's necessary for the optimal functioning of the site and help to save your settings.
Agree